Search for: "Jones v. Department of Motor Vehicles"
Results 21 - 40
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2018, 9:57 am
Jones, ___ N.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 4:40 pm
(a)), with which she was charged for submitting a false stolen vehicle report to the California Highway Patrol, was preempted by Vehicle Code section 20 (false statement or knowing concealment of any material fact in any document filed with the Department of Motor Vehicles or the Department of the California Highway Patrol) and Vehicle Code section 10501 (filing of false or fraudulent report of theft of a… [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:37 am
Jones (Daquan) v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:39 am
The offending passage occurred in the judge’s dissent in Jones v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:20 pm
NEITLICH, Appellants, v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:54 am
The purpose of the Transportation Act’s employee-protection provisions is “to encourage employee reporting of noncompliance with safety regulations governing commercial motor vehicles. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:25 am
The Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 2011 Crash Statistics Report, for example, indicates that 4.632 bicyclists were injured and 120 bicycled were fatally injured that year. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 4:51 am
Waterman v Jones, 2007 NY Slip Op 07815. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
, Huie, Fernambucq & Stewart LLP, Birmingham, Ala. 14 $124,546,733 Motor Vehicle Pacheco v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
MALCOLM JONES, JR., an individual, Appellees. 2nd District. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Circuit, unreported)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionBrief for federal respondents in oppositionAmicus brief of AARP and the Consumer Federation of AmericaPetitioner's reply Title: Ford Motor Credit Company v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:29 pm
The superseding indictment also alleges that the defendants lured a victim by using the mail system and used motor vehicles to facilitate each assault, establishing the jurisdictional element at section 249(a)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Bankruptcy: SUPREME COURT HEARS BANKRUPTCY CASE OVER OWNERSHIP COSTS FOR VEHICLES, Ransom v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:42 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Circuit ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am
The court found the domicile to be in New York, thus, to the disappointment of the heirs, the publicity rights followed Monroe to the grave.In 2010, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem sued General Motors for the unauthorized use of an image of Albert Einstein in a humorous advertisement of a General Motors’ vehicle, depicting the physicist topless (Case no. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Jones (1997) -- rejected the President's categorical contention that private lawsuits against the Executive may not proceed during his term in office.Santa Fe Independent School District v. [read post]
