Search for: "Jones v. Long" Results 21 - 40 of 2,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
It consists of 12 further members, including Jennifer Bezaire, Chatelle Cseh, Darcy Romaine, Jacob Demstra, Jeremy Opolsky, John Adair, Rebecca Jones, Sunil Mathal, Suzanne Chiodo, Tamara D. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:17 am by Dennis Crouch
The recent case of Purdue Pharma v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The difference is that a long list of journalistic organizations came to her aid. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down by Lewis J in the long-running litigation between the Dyson Group companies and the broadcasters Channel 4 and ITN, Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
In one case, the Court made race-conscious affirmative action—which had long been only grudgingly accepted—even more difficult. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm by Eric Goldman
In that respect, the law has been quite consistent for a long time. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Jones-Doherty, Morally Regulatable Lives: Corporate Sovereignty, the Rise of Burwell v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:02 am by Howard Bashman
Jones; The Eleventh Circuit says that it can review the genuineness of fact disputes in qualified-immunity appeals so long as the defendant also challenges the existence of a clearly established constitutional violation” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]