Search for: "Jordan v United Property " Results 21 - 40 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 12:35 pm by Eliot Kim
Earlier this month, the Second Circuit issued a decision in Linde v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
* No Air for Jordan: Michael Jordan Loses Fight over Marks in ChinaBasketball star Michael Jordan faces problems protecting his image in the world's most populous jurisdiction, writes sports-loving guest Kat Jani. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
NOTE: Some of the points made in this post were suggested by Nevada Solicitor General Lawrence VanDyke and Assistant Solicitor General Jordan Smith. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:32 am by Kevin Johnson
He contended that the vagueness doctrine applies to the immigration laws, as clearly held by Jordan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 9:36 am by admin
In late June of last year, the Supreme Court ruled in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 10:04 am by Jordan Brunner
  Luca Marzorati previewed the argument in John Doe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
§ 2333, reads: Any national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs, may sue therefor in any appropriate district court of the United States and shall recover threefold the damages he or she sustains and the cost of the suit, including attorney’s fees. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm by Barry Sookman
On January 22, I gave a talk at the Law Society of Upper Canada’s 19th Annual Intellectual Property Law: The Year in Review program. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:22 pm by J
Jordan [1981] 1 WLR 246at p. 256, per Lord Wilberforce). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
The floor goes to the CJEU | Is Michael Jordan’s ”Jumpman” logo a copyright infringement? [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson
Dimaya contends that, in seeking to bar vagueness challenges to the immigration laws, the government is seeking nothing less than to overrule the court’s 1951 decision in Jordan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The floor goes to the CJEU | Is Michael Jordan’s ”Jumpman” logo a copyright infringement? [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Bloomberg BNA, Jordan Rubin looks at the cert petition in Hidalgo v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
The floor goes to the CJEU | Is Michael Jordan’s ”Jumpman” logo a copyright infringement? [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
The floor goes to the CJEU | Is Michael Jordan’s ”Jumpman” logo a copyright infringement? [read post]