Search for: "Jordan v. Doe" Results 21 - 40 of 1,069
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
The shoes were filled with holy water sourced from the Jordan River and adorned with religious symbols, including a miniature crucifix and the inscription “MT. 14:25,” referencing the biblical passage describing Jesus walking on water.[20] Despite not being endorsed or made by Nike, the Jesus Shoes gained popularity and were worn by celebrities like Drake. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
Recognizing the worst in government transparency. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am by CMS
The Supreme Court noted that, in the High Court Agbaje proceedings, Justice Munby made reference to Jordan v Jordan [1999] EWHC Admin 666 in which Lord Justice Thorpe criticised rule 3.17 of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991 (the relevant legislation prior to the 2010 Rules) which provided for an exparte application where leave is sought under Part III of the 1984 Act. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
" with the Cuban apparatus.Pix Credit hereThis is not to suggest that the fever dream of the American and Cuban exile establishment will inevitably harvest the plot on which Caribbean Marxism was planted; the collapse of the contemporary Cuban political-economic model doe not necessarily or inevitably mean the establishment of a liberal democratic state, or of a military or a klepto-dictatorship of some sort (though the model provided by the historical arc of Nicaragua's… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]