Search for: "Jorge v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Madrigal v Tellez, ______F3d_____, (5th Cir., 2017) Jorge Carlos Vergara Madrigal (Vergara) and Angelica Fuentes Tellez (Fuentes) were the parents of two young daughters, ages five and three years. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:02 pm by Steven Boutwell
  Section 909 (g) states that “[c]ompensation under the [the LHWCA] to aliens not residents (or about to become nonresidents) of the United States or Canada shall be the same in amount as provided for residents. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
  Click here to go to www.nylj.com   United States, appellee v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am by Steve Vladeck
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:07 pm by Florian Mueller
A second attempt by Apple to overturn a 5G iPhone and iPad sales ban in Colombia has just failed as a Colombian court denied a petition by Apple, but the iPhone maker hasn't exhausted all procedural options yet.The first failed attempt was an emergency motion that Apple had brought with the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:48 am
  The SEC has also recently updated its Investor Bulletin on life settlement investments, which can be found here.The indictment in the criminal case, United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:59 am by Jorge Miranda
The terms of the bilateral agreement reached by the United States and Mexico on August 27, 2018, as per public statements released thus far, are summarized in Part V of Whither NAFTA? [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:00 am by Jorge Miranda
The United States and Canada are continuing their meetings this week to try to hash out a bilateral deal in renegotiating NAFTA that would be not only satisfactory to both but also consistent with the bilateral deal arrived at by the United States and Mexico in late August. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 3:14 am by Jon Gelman
In his ruling, Judge Jorge Cueto stated that the law is the exclusive remedy for injured workers, and therefore, only under rare circumstances can they sue their employers. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am by Jason Rantanen
  Moreover, Judge Higginson points out that both HTC and Ericsson, as well as the United States as amicus curiae, requested jury instructions on apportionment. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 9:41 am
Sharpe, Judge), arguing that the district court erred by (1) concluding that the sentence recommended by the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") accounted for the factors under § 3553(a) and (2) failing to state adequately its reasons for imposing the chosen sentence, as required by § 3553(c). [read post]