Search for: "Joyce v Joyce" Results 21 - 40 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 1:20 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The Erie County Court of Common Pleas recently issued an interesting January 25, 2012 Memorandum Opinion in the case of Joyce v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:29 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0439, 2010 MT 113, JOYCE COOPER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:33 am
Cambridge City Council v Joyce No link for this one, but it was noted on Lawtel this morning and has been reported as [2009] All ER (D) 234 (Feb). [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 2:10 pm
As the lawyer responsible for Part VII of the Care Standards Act, I'm glad that this attempt has failed to limit the misconduct that can be taken into account by the Care Standards Tribunal on an appeal by a person listed as unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:48 am by Marcia Oddi
For publication opinions today (4): In Joyce Bellows, Edgar Bellows, Barbara Stutsman, and Wayne Stutsman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
Justice Joyce Kennard The California Supreme Court has ruled unanimously, in a decision written by Justice Joyce Kennard, in Benitez v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 8:39 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
 One exception is a recent appellate case from Indiana, Gillette v Franciscan Alliance. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:57 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Joyce argues that the entire manufacturing industry is at risk if the United States Supreme Court declines to grant certiorari of the Sixth Circuit’s decision in the case of Whirlpool v. [read post]