Search for: "Judicial Correction Services Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Michael C. Dorf
Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am by Guest Author
  If that question is asked, the correct answer with respect to this statute is: not a lot. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc., 2023 VT 65. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
The case concerned a medical service provider (MDK) who had processed the personal health data of an incapacitated employee and passed the information to a health insurance fund. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Digests of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Felix Manufacturing Inc., Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Allianz Insurance Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
… [T]he majority of the Court of Appeal was correct to conclude that this error did not result in an unfair trial or a miscarriage of justice in this case. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
”[6] One of the several disconnects between the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ animal studies and the human diseases claimed was the disparity of dose and duration between the relied upon studies and the service men claimants. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 6:03 am by Eugene Volokh
This imbalance is in dire need of correction by returning to the statutory text. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 3:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A minimum of $10,000 for each violation due to willful neglect and corrected within 30 days, except that the total amount imposed on the covered entity or business associate for all violations of an identical requirement or prohibition during a calendar year may not exceed $250,000. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm by Sasha Volokh
But the government can always pursue its goal—providing services to victims of sex crimes, or similar—by providing the same amount of money from general revenues. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
Further picking apart the definition of “social media platform,” the court says it’s vague to refer to the service’s “substantial function” but also include key exceptions, making services uncertain whether they fit into the exceptions or not. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court concluded, however, that plaintiff's allegations, even if factually correct, wouldn't be legally actionable. [read post]