Search for: "Justice v. Com."
Results 21 - 40
of 828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
” In an 8–1 decision by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
” In an 8–1 decision by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:00 pm
” In an 8–1 decision by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:25 am
Read the full text of the decision Kentucky v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 9:49 am
Booking.com (March 23): Whether the addition of “.com” to an otherwise generic term by an online business can create a protectable trademark Google v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 6:13 am
(Even Justice Stevens noted, in McIntyre v Ohio Elections Com'n, 514 U.S. 334, 342 n.5 (1995), that the practice of grading law school examinations "blindly" is "now-pervasive. [read post]
24 May 2018, 2:11 pm
Texas v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
In Kellogg Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
Law in the News alerts us (on 2/3/12) to this provocative article: Colbert v. the Court: Why, in the battle over Citizens United, the Supreme Court never had a chance," Dahlia Lithwick, Slate dot com, Thursday, Feb. 2, 2012 Excerpt: ".... [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:15 am
On January 8th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 9:20 pm
Com'r Social Sec. [read post]
20 May 2013, 11:26 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:43 pm
Chief Justice Ronald M. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:32 am
Dennis Stiner v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Google and Amazon (A9.com)(9th Cir. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
A mark will have to achieve distinctiveness specifically "...in the minds of the public".Justice Ginsburg then moved onto considering whether the mark in question is registrable or not. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
A mark will have to achieve distinctiveness specifically "...in the minds of the public".Justice Ginsburg then moved onto considering whether the mark in question is registrable or not. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am
A mark will have to achieve distinctiveness specifically "...in the minds of the public".Justice Ginsburg then moved onto considering whether the mark in question is registrable or not. [read post]
