Search for: "Justice v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 21 - 40
of 434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 7:06 am
Yesterday the European Court of Justice (ECJ) followed the core of the Opinion of the Advocate General (AG) in Schrems v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
The reality suggests that the current application of the public interest test constructively disregards the complex social factors and institutional barriers that place some communities at risk of involvement in the criminal justice system. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice were heard on 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Borak, Lee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Borak, Lee v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Barry SookmanInternet justice: Mosley v Google In the landmark ruling in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (case no. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:10 pm
May your remaining years be filled with comfort, joy and security. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
And in her view, the Social Security Administration is even more powerful and ubiquitous than the CFPB. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 7:07 am
Justice Barrett delivered the opinion, in which Justices Roberts, Breyer, Kagan and Kavanaugh joined in full. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2022. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:13 am
Trump and the Trump legal team’s brief in the case of Trump v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
Forbes had an article “Apple Users Warned About iOS13 Security And Privacy Problem”. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:49 am
I believe that this censorship was draconian given that details of own case, Stott v Minogue 2000 SLT (Sh Ct) 25, & GWD 36-1386, - which spawned the petition – and the decision by the Social Security Commissioner, Ref: CS1/136/02. are in part matters of public record, or have been reported widely in the press and legal journals and are the two most important Scottish cases that deal with the influence of freemasonry in the justice system. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
Commissioner of Public Health. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
