Search for: "Justice v. Kansas, State of"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,018
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 12:29 pm
Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court in Kansas v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 8:06 pm
David Schwartz discusses Monday’s argument in Kansas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:23 am
American Civil Liberties Union Kansas v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:18 pm
Kansas frames the issue very differently, telling the justices that the state has simply “redefined,” rather than “abolished” the insanity defense. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 9:27 am
In State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:34 pm
” Unlike last Term’s oral argument and opinion announcement in Glossip v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
Today, in the United States Supreme Court's decision in Kansas v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:52 am
State of Kansas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:55 am
Justice Sotomayor delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Kansas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 12:00 am
" Kansas v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:05 am
Here's the abstract: State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 10:19 am
After laying out the dispute's factual background and outlining each state's basic arguments, the Court - in an opinion by Justice Alito - proceeded to sidestep nearly all of them, including the entirety of both sides' statutory and constitutional arguments. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:29 pm
Since the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 11:51 am
Congratulations to Savannah Law School Professor Caprice Roberts who was recently cited by Justice Thomas in his dissent in Kansas v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Support for Roe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
Supreme Court in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:11 pm
Hat tip to Sarah Johnson, who forwarded info about State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:17 am
Today, in the National Law Journal, two former Supreme Court Justices spoke out; Former Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court Ruth V. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
That case, Cutter v. [read post]
