Search for: "KEEFE V US" Results 21 - 40 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
The authors’ job is to make sense of the judicial reasoning and to unpick, for example, the madness of the majority theocratic US Supreme Court’s politicised and reactionary abominations, as in Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 6:19 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Allan Dafoe, Samuel Liu, Brian O'Keefe, & Jessica Chen Weiss, Provocation, Public Opinion, and International Disputes: Evidence from ChinaDavid Brenner & Martina Tazzioli, Defending Society, Building the Nation: Rebel Governance as Competing Biopolitics Stephanie J Rickard, Interests, Institutions, and the Environment: An Examination of Fisheries Subsidies Scott Radnitz, Solidarity through Cynicism? [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am by Joe Mullin
In this episode, you’ll learn about: The prior art, or evidence, of earlier technology that EFF was able to present to courts to prove that the so-called “podcasting patent” was invalid How the landmark Alice v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:41 am by rainey Reitman
Maryland Turns 35, But Its Health Is Declining, EFF Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:41 am by rainey Reitman
You were an intern with us, way back when you were in law school, but since then you've blazed a trail that's been just so fun for us to watch. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 2:41 am by rainey Reitman
  Resources Data Harvesting and Profiling: Ricci v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal will consider whether title to land, which was gifted to the Council for use as a school under the School Sites Act 1841, reverted to the donor’s estate when the school ceased to operate from the gifted land. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The menacing by stalking statute, R.C. 2903.211(A)(2), reads: No person, through the use of any form of written communication or any electronic method of remotely transferring information … shall post a message or use any intentionally written or verbal graphic gesture with purpose to … violate division (A)(1) of this section. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]