Search for: "KERR v. ENGLAND"
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
This is done through the HRLA’s annual Judicial Review Mooting Competition, Careers Day and the Lord Kerr Essay Competition, which was set up by the HRLA to honour the legacy and human rights contribution of Lord Brian Francis Kerr, Baron Kerr of Tonaghmore, the former Supreme Court Justice, following a generous donation by his son, Patrick Kerr. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Lady Hale interjects in jest, noting he might have to explain the importance of 1966 (when England won the world cup). [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
It follows from Lord Kerr’s rather more specific interpretation of the Directive that he did not agree with the majority view that the planning authority had discharged its obligation by following Natural England’s advice. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
Kerr, “Legacies: A Matter of some Interest” (1997), 16 E. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:42 am
In August 2008 subscription service Lawtel picked a curious little post-franchising case, ChipsAway International Ltd v Errol Kerr [2008] EWHC 1887 (Ch), a decision of the Chancery Division for England and Wales by Sir Andrew Park (see IPKat note here). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
Causation goes to damages, not to liability (Kambadzi per Lord Hope at §54; Lady Hale at §§73-74; Lord Kerr at §88). [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Reed agrees with Lord Kerr. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
In Dalia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
It was “incontestably clear” (per Lord Kerr at [59] and [58]). [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:25 am
The case of Entick v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
The quoted “law professor” Posner criticizes here is Orin Kerr. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
On 17 March 2020 the Lord Chief Justice announced that no jury trials longer than three days must he be held in England and Wales. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 287, n. 5 (T. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 5:36 pm
So far the business of the Courts in England and Wales continues. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:39 am
Toulson LJ noted that, although Sabaf SpA v Meneghetti SpA [2002] EWCA Civ 976 referred to the joint tortfeasor “making the act his own”, this merely means that “the defendant must have involved himself in the commission of the tort in such a way as to justify the conclusion that he combined with the other[s]” to commit the tort. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
