Search for: "Kagan v. State of Nevada"
Results 21 - 40
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:21 am
S. ___ (2019) (discussing Nevada v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
The Court heard oral argument in Espinoza v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
Hyatt, which overturned the court’s decision in Nevada v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
” In Hyatt, Breyer was dissenting from a 5-4 decision that overruled the 1979 case Nevada v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm
When the court last month overruled Nevada v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
” Larson v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am
“Nevada v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
In order to reach its result, the majority had to overrule Nevada v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
In Hyatt, the justices were asked to overrule the court’s 1979 decision in Nevada v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Justice Kagan asked whether this should just be one 93-year-old precedent or if it means the state could put the same cross up today which is just as constitutional as this one. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Although, as explained above, the claim should be unavailing because of intra-state federalism principles, we should recognize that when, in the words of Justice Kagan’s Janus dissent last year, the First Amendment is being “weaponized,” the preferred instrument of mass destruction these days is the notion of compelled speech.Lesson #2: Judge Graffeo is Not Alone in his MisunderstandingsThe Supreme Court tried to anticipate and avoid missteps like that taken by… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm
The question was whether to overrule the decades-old precedent Nevada v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Wainwright (1986) and Panetti v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
Stenberg v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm
Briefing continues in Nevada v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
Husted v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
Thus, as in states where severance is not up to the parties but is mandatory, such as Nevada or Arkansas, the preclusive effect of the acquittal would not have been waived. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Michael Kagan, a professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas William S. [read post]
