Search for: "Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2018, 7:13 am by Carl Neff
M&F Worldwide Corp., 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014) (“MFW”), so long as the requisite protections under MFW are put in place prior to the start of negotiations between the purchaser and seller. [read post]
M&F Worldwide Corp.[1] (“MFW”) on how boards can structure special committees and minority stockholder votes to have board decisions adjudicated under the highly deferential protection of the business judgment rule.[2] However, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently found in In re Dell Technologies Inc. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 11:34 am by John Stigi
M&F Worldwide Corp., 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014) (“MFW”), as long as the requisite procedural protections under MFW are put in place prior to the commencement of economic negotiations. [read post]
23 May 2020, 7:30 am
M&F Worldwide Corp., 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014) (“MFW”) and its progeny applies in a non-MFW scenario (i.e., in a transaction without a conflicted controlling shareholder). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 3:21 am by Broc Romanek
M&F Worldwide Corp., 88 A.3d 635 (Del. 2014), because, among other things, it was not conditioned from the outset on approval from a majority of the outstanding minority shares. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 6:15 am
 M&F Worldwide Corp. in controlling stockholder transactions, among other things. [read post]