Search for: "Kartes v. Kartes"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2015, 8:01 pm
O primeiro kart de competição, com motor de 100cc, ganhou aos dez anos. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
Meanwhile, on the Class 46 trade mark law blog, former guest Kat Laetitia spots some non-confusingly similar diamond marks, here, and Katfriend Pedro Malaquias points to a recent Portuguese opposition involving "KART"-based marks. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:06 am
In Gillette v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:26 am
Birss J held that a double patenting objection could be taken as a ground for refusing a post-grant amendment to a claim but only in the following circumstances:(ii) The two patents have the same priority dates and are held by the same applicant (or its successor in title);(ii) The two claims must have the same scope;(iii) The two claims must be independent claims;(iv) If the objection arises in the Patents Court and both patents are before the court, it can be cured by amending either… [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 10:21 pm
According to the case-law of the ECJ since Courage v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am
Douglas stated that he would normally not race a go-kart but that he agreed to race because he wanted to be a part of his team.While Douglas was racing, he encountered another go-kart stopped on the track. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 2:49 pm
v? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:02 pm
O primeiro kart de competição, com motor de 100cc, ganhou aos dez anos. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:15 am
Bar humbug, say lawyers Read (The pic on the left is from my F**kART series of paintings and other oddities.) [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 3:44 pm
v=93whC3SsvSY My plan for the rest of the day is to continue to check out tablets. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:43 am
Kredit Karte Positive Software v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:09 pm
IKE America, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:25 am
Oskar Systems, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:19 am
In Pacio v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:43 am
See Rice v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 3:59 pm
I think the downsides of the courthouse so far are: 1) no cafeteria and 2) cramped security checkpoint to get in.)The highest profile case is USA v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 8:04 pm
The Third Party Claim was dismissed with costs.The question of whether a go-kart is an automobile was decided pursuant to the three-part test set out in Grummet v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 7:41 pm
For full text see: Adams v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Torts Products Liability Suit Arising From Overturning Of Go-Kart Denied Dismissal or Change of Venue Canale v. [read post]
