Search for: "Kats v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2013, 11:13 am
A few days have passed since this decision and this Kat could not but think about it day and night (of course!). [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:10 am
This Kat recently had an opportunity revisit the patent decision given by the United States Supreme Court on 20 March in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:23 pm
Of all the matters before the Supreme Court this term, this Kat is anxiously awaiting an opinion in one pirating case: Allen v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:53 am
Much discussion ensued over the course of the conference about the U.S. doctrine of functionality, and as if on cue, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (this Kat’s home Court) has given us more wax to chew on on the issue in the case of Maker’s Mark v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:02 am
However, this is again subject to the workload of the various translation departments.The EU is short of money because the member states refuse to increase revenue. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
Anyone connected to the world of law is no doubt aware of the passing away over the weekend of Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 3:59 am
Nearly a year ago this Kat reported on Regeneron Pharmacueticals Inc and Bayer AG v Genentech Inc [2012] EWHC 657 (see BAILII).Cat's eye does not suffer from macular degeneration Nearly a year on, and we are treated to the Court of Appeal consideration of the matter, which hit the streets yesterday, and which you can also read on BAILII. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am
This Kat's gift to all the Kat moms is an opportunity to not miss anything that the Kats have reported on...Time to catch up on the IPKat! [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:14 am
Despite the initial media frenzy two weeks ago, the Tulisa sex tape story is still with us (see previous Kat Post here.) [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 7:35 am
This Kat was happy to learn that Dr Stewart's DPhil supervisor was his very own internal examiner, Professor George Fleet. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
A Kat remembers ... [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Seeping wounds: not the name of a village in the West Country (the Kat has checked), and neither is it the most savoury of subjects for polite after-dinner conversation. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
This Kat will not attempt a summary here as the talks were very procedural. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:01 pm
The Kats' credo ...IPKat events: a couple of updates. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
This was expanded on in that there was clearly no possibility of a mutually agreeable settlement if each party was to maintain their proposed price, and movement on this fundamental point seemed unlikely (and in any case would be seen as against competition law).Each party was then given 5 minutes to state their conclusions. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Corp. v Triarc Corp., 93 NY2d 525, 528 [1999]). [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
Yesterday evening this Kat attended the UCL IBIL seminar on Trade Mark Law and the Internet, dedicated to an evening of discussion on service provider liability and recent decisions such as L’Oréal v eBay, LVMH v eBay and the numerous Google cases. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
[Details in the Kat's prior post here.] [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
All Kats are now reporting for duty Back again! [read post]
