Search for: "Keith J. Miller" Results 21 - 40 of 96
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2017, 6:31 am by INFORRM
 We are aware of only two trials: Guise v Shah, a claim in libel, harassment and data protection, listed for 5 days before Dingemans J, beginning on 2 May 2017. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post about the judgment from the victorious defendant’s solicitor, Keith Mathiesen. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Keith Bennett, election agent to Keith Vaz, has  accepted substantial undisclosed damages from the Telegraph for an allegation that he had misused his status in relation to North Korean visitors to the House of Commons. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
Asay cdasay BYU Richard Ashcroft qmulbioethics Queen Mary London Jonathan Askin jaskin Brooklyn Lisa Austin Lisa_M_Austin Toronto Regina Austin raustin92913 Penn Ian Ayres iayres Yale Barbara Babcock bababcock Stanford Sandra Babcock sandralbabcock Cornell Sam Bagenstos sbagen Michigan Stephen Bainbridge ProfBainbridge UCLA Jeffrey Baker JRBProf Faulkner Jack Balkin jackbalkin Yale David Ball wdavidball Santa Clara Derek Bambauer dbambauer Arizona Jennifer Bankier jbankier Dalhousie John Banzhaf… [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Asay cdasay Penn State Dickinson Richard Ashcroft qmulbioethics Queen Mary London Jonathan Askin jaskin Brooklyn Lisa Austin Lisa_M_Austin Toronto Regina Austin raustin92913 Penn Ian Ayres iayres Yale Barbara Babcock bababcock Stanford Sandra Babcock sandralbabcock Cornell Sam Bagenstos sbagen Michigan Stephen Bainbridge ProfBainbridge UCLA Jeffrey Baker JRBProf Faulkner Jack Balkin jackbalkin Yale David Ball wdavidball Santa Clara Derek Bambauer dbambauer Arizona Jennifer Bankier jbankier Dalhousie… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:38 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Moderator: Jill Rhodes; Discussants: Judith Miller, Keith Lowry and Kathleen Rice [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  Quite the contrary, Third Restatement’s drafters criticized comment j’s presumption language as “unfortunate” and stated that it shouldn’t be followed. [read post]