Search for: "Kellogg, Brown & Root Services, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 118
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 7:52 am by Beth Graham
See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 739-40 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (explaining that under the doctrine of direct benefits estoppel, a non-signatory plaintiff seeking to benefit under a contract cannot avoid the contract’s arbitration clause). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 2:25 pm by Ben Vernia
*   *   * Wackenhut provided U.S. military bases with firefighting and fire protection services under a subcontract with Kellogg Brown & Root Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
Although the Target court does not explicitly state so, it appears to follow the “substantial purpose” version of the “primary purpose” test used by the court in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F. 3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
Although the Target court does not explicitly state so, it appears to follow the “substantial purpose” version of the “primary purpose” test used by the court in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F. 3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
  The firm might, of course, be sued, but it would be entitled to have the dispute diverted into a private arbitral forum by filing a motion to compel, relying on the legal services contract signed by the client. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:31 am by Greene LLP
The suit brought forward by whistleblower Benjamin Carter against Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:24 am by Steven Wildberger
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] unanimously Tuesday in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]