Search for: "Kelly v. Obama"
Results 21 - 40
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Krstić and a “turning point” appellate ruling in Prosecutor v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
” In an op-ed for The Baltimore Sun, Kelly Shackelford weighs in on The American Legion v. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 8:20 am
Last week, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 10:21 am
Kelly v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
Kelly, decided on July 25. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
See Texas v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Trump, Brennan Center v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 5:59 am
The court reserved until a later date any ruling on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Vidal v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
Russell Spivak summarized the Second Circuit’s opinion in Doe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
Lewis (No. 16-285) and Ernst and Young LLP v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
Kelly (pictured), had concluded that “there is no credible path toward” to get a ruling in the courts on the legality of the Obama policy. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
Din and Kleindienst v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
Roosevelt to Barack Obama concerning pending Supreme Court cases. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s decision in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in Washington v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Perhaps recognizing the first restriction, DHS Secretary John Kelly himself has suggested that the funds that might be revoked are those provided to states for immigration-related purposes. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Recognizing how narrowly the order defines sanctuary jurisdictions is helpful in avoiding unnecessary rabbit holes, like the recurring suggestion that, for purposes of fighting Trump’s executive order, the § 1983 Third Circuit case Galarza v. [read post]
