Search for: "Kemp v. E "
Results 21 - 40
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2017, 12:42 pm
The case, Curling v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:56 am
Désirée Fields' guest piece "Classes, Clarity and Confusion: the legacy of IP TRANSLATOR", hosted yesterday by the IPKat here, has attracted a good deal of response. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:35 am
Kemp. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 7:37 am
Shaken Baby Syndrome: A South African Medico-Legal PerspectiveA le Roux-Kemp and E Burgerhttp://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2014volume17no4/2014%2817%294LeRouxKemp%26Burger.article.pdf4. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:10 pm
§ 325.2(e)(1)(i). [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:26 am
The online e-filing portal (click here) allows searches by case index number or party name. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
Consider, for example, this post about a case ordering a compelled buyout of the complaining shareholder (Zulkofske v Zulkofske, 2012 NY Slip Op 51210(U) [Suffolk Co., 2012]), or this post about a case finding money damages sufficient to remedy the oppressive conduct (Hammad v Jamal Kamal Corp., 68 Misc 3d 1227(A) [Queens Co., 2020]). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:34 am
Feinberg v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
Kemp. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Use of a Bulk File Changer to Manipulate Metadata Leads to Sanctions for Defendant: In T&E Investment Group, LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:54 pm
Attorney for Meredith: E. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 12:00 am
S. 350 (1993), and vital judicial review to be blocked, see, e. g., Coleman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
In Mizrahi v Cohen, 34 Misc 3d 1210 [A] [Sup Ct Kings County Jan. 12, 2012], Kings County Commercial Division Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:21 am
In Sobol v Les Pieds Nickels, Inc., the Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed the lower court’s denial of the respondent shareholder’s request for permission to file an untimely election made eight years after the dissolution proceeding’s commencement. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
The third, also under BCL 1104-a, is the rule under Kemp & Beatley that “[e]very order of dissolution . . . must be conditioned upon permitting any shareholder of the corporation to elect to purchase the complaining shareholder’s stock at fair value. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Furthermore, in Johnson v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
Kemp as a frame on which to hang the history of the death penalty in this country - and of efforts to abolish it. [read post]
