Search for: "Kennard v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
Justice Joyce Kennard: ??? [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 1:38 pm
Keating v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
Justice Kennard then asked what law applies to work outside the state of California. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Last month the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Bourhis v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
(Barquis v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Later Justices Corrigan, Kennard and Baxter joined in this chorus. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 6:27 am
Thanks to this post at Crime & Consequences, I see that earlier this week the California Supreme Court ruled in People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
And before that, we had retirements by Justices Werdegar, Baxter, Kennard, Moreno and George -- all within the past decade or so, and all of whom (I believe) remain alive and kicking to this very day.Try to get a similar list of United States Supreme Court justices who've left, particularly in the current political era. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:51 am
Last January the California Supreme Court found in People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:06 am
In Gill v. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 12:15 pm
A Golfer has No Duty to Protect Another Player From Ordinary NegligenceShin v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
Justice Kennard and Moreno say "Sometimes," and Justice Baxter (in dissent) says "No. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 11:43 am
Deal with it.Justice Kennard, who's never liked the primary assumption of the risk doctrine to begin with, continues her disagreement. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:27 am
I cannot subscribe to such an expansive interpretation of the natural and probable consequences doctrine even in the context of gang violence, which no one doubts is a plague upon some of our state's most vulnerable communities. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:20 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), and Bowers v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 9:10 am
Kennard v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:25 pm
Yesterday's oral argument in Gentry v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(9) Asked by Justice Kennard what would have happened in 1948 if the state had set up domestic partnerships for interracial couples, San Francisco attorney Stewart said: ??? [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
Justices Kennard and Moreno concurred with the dissent.In a vigorous dissent Justice Werdegar stated that she would hold that ability to perform the job is not an element of the plaintiff's cause of action. [read post]
