Search for: "Kennedy v. Chief Circuit Court of Appeals et al" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
The United States National Federation of Independent Business et al v Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed by President Obama in March 2010. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
  That new case is Lucas, et al., v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 6:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
District Court's website (a link to the case, Perry, et al., v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am by Mark Walsh
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, in Boston. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 7:04 am
Merrill Lynch, et al. (06-1341). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Or what about Justices who compiled works such as those collected by Samuel Blatchford in Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Second Circuit (1852-88) (24 vols.)? [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:20 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Holder (Susan SEVEN–SKY, Also Known as Susan Sevensky, et al., Appellants v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The new case is McCreary County, et al., v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am by Erin Miller
 The Chief Justice dissents, joined by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, and Sotomayor. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm by Lyle Denniston
Fox Television Stations, et al. (10-1293), but the protection from children from profanity and nudity considered harmful to them is directly at issue. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
He cited subsequent cases that have construed Kiyemba narrowly: Aamer, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit--has gone on to also address the other half of the RFRA equation:  the D.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
In January, it declined to hear a long-running case - Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs, et al. v. [read post]