Search for: "Kent v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2024, 2:48 pm
The basis for this decision is explained in Cyber Power Systems (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
" At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger surmises that Justice Sotomayor, as evidenced by her questions in Tuesday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 9:35 am
At the IIT Chicago-Kent Faculty Blog, César F. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Cain, a Louisiana capital case in which it will consider whether a defendant has a right to an independent court hearing on whether he is mentally disabled and therefore ineligible for the death penalty; and Commil USA v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
Rogers and J.D.B. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am
At Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger discusses the Court’s decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
Ken Paulson of the First Amendment Center has an op-ed in USA Today about Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am
The M/V Miss Cissy (“Miss Cissy”), a 46.5-foot commercial vessel owned by Parker Drilling Offshore USA, LLC (“PDO”), was sailing on the waterway at the same time ahead of them. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses Monday’s grant of review in Montgomery v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:16 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger weighs in on Wearry v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:14 am
These factual allegations, as supplemented by plaintiffs’ papers in opposition to defendant attorney’s dismissal motion, sufficiently alleged a legal malpractice claim (see generally Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]; Escape Airports [USA], Inc. v Kent, Beatty & Gordon, LLP, 79 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 am
Other commentary focuses on Fisher v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:11 am
Kent Scheidegger of Crime & Consequences calls the decision “unsurprising. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:16 am
The last two weeks of planning since my move to Kent have been both enjoyable and productive. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am
The other opinion came in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
” Kent Scheidegger’s comments for Crime & Consequences can be accessed here. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
Yesterday’s decision in Yates v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
In the second case decided yesterday, Astra USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
