Search for: "Key v. SSA" Results 21 - 35 of 35
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm by Jean Braucher
The Arizona Supreme Court currently has under review a mortgage documentation case, Vasquez v. [read post]
[iv] Flawed Best Value Analyses In addition to overturning best value decisions based on flawed technical evaluations[v], GAO also reaffirmed its view that a Source Selection Authority’s (“SSA’s”) reliance solely on adjectival ratings without consideration of lower rated but acceptable proposals, with lower relative prices, was improper. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:06 pm by Christopher J. Walker
As the Supreme Court suggested two years ago in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
(D.I. 59, Ex. 6 at§ 6.E) Specifically, the Special Servicing Agreement required that the Trusts provide written notice to the rating agencies,[4] and receive written confirmation from the rating agencies, that the proposed appointment would not result in a reduction or withdrawal of the Notes' then-current ratings (the "SSA Rating Agency Condition"). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:37 pm
You may already have been denied disability benefits twice by the Social Security Administration (SSA). [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Neither the DRA legislation nor CMS' July 27, 2006 communication to state Medicaid directors references structured settlements. von Saucken identified and explained key DRA issues for structured settlements whether paid directly to personal injury claimants and their spouses or indirectly through a special needs trust. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
However, he pointed out that the difference in formal standards—misleading v. materially misleading—was not the key; a marketer debating whether its communications are only misleading or materially misleading is already in a bad place. [read post]