Search for: "Khaira v Khaira" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2014, 2:12 am by Laura Sandwell
Khaira & Ors v Shergill & Ors, heard 19 – 20 February 2014. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 2:49 am by Laura Sandwell
From Wednesday until Thursday 19 February 2014 is the appeal of Khaira & Ors v Shergill & Ors, to be heard by L Neuberger, L Mance, L Clarke, L Sumption and L Hodge. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The Second Department quoted with approval from the First Department's May 25, 2012 decision in Khaira v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:53 pm by Rachel Marcus
It seems dangerously close to asking the court to adjudicate on religious doctrine, exactly what it said – quite rightly – it would not do in Khaira v Shergill [2012] EWCA Civ 983. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:02 am by tracey
Shergill and others v Khaira and others: [2012] EWCA Civ 983;  [2012] WLR (D)  214 “The courts will abstain from adjudicating on the truth, merits or sincerity of differences in religious doctrine or belief and on the correctness or accuracy of religious practice, custom or tradition. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Modhej & Anor, R (On the Applications) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 957 (17 July 2012) Khaira & Ors v Shergill & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 983 (17 July 2012) AB, (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 978 (17 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch) (17 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Roberts, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
In what is the first Appellate Division case to date interpreting this legislation, in Khaira v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
(See Bureau of Labor Statistics for its publications at http://www.bls.gov) First Department Holds That Double Dipping Is Not Allowed Under Temporary Maintenance Guidelines In Khaira v Khaira, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2012 WL 371997 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) the Appellate Division, in an opinion by Justice Saxe, considered the guidelines for awards of temporary spousal maintenance under Domestic Relations Law 236 (B)(5-a),… [read post]