Search for: "King v. Department of the Treasury"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2021, 8:47 pm
If NFTs are considered “substitutes for currency,” then the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department of Treasury may subject them to the agency’s regulations. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:50 pm
After nearly ninety minutes of oral arguments today in King v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am
If you answered these questions "no," you'll take comfort in a decision issued last week by Kings County Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in a case called Varveris v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:37 am
” He uses “emolument of the exchequer” to refer to an increase in the national treasury. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:49 am
Despite Saudi Arabia’s testy relationship with Iran, U.S. officials stated that King Salman voiced support for the deal in his meeting with Secretary Carter---though the Washington Post tells us that the King insisted on a “snap back” of sanctions in the case of Iranian noncompliance with the deal’s provisions. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 10:11 am
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin informed the Senate banking committee that his department intends to investigate the phenomenon further. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court, in King v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
• To the contrary, Consider King v Brown in 2006. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
• To the contrary, Consider King v Brown in 2006. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
• To the contrary, Consider King v Brown in 2006. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
• To the contrary, Consider King v Brown in 2006. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
• To the contrary, Consider King v Brown in 2006. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
As Lord Mansfield said in 1769, in the case of R. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
Department of Labor’s just announced successful whistleblower prosecution in Perez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:00 am
If you answered these questions "no," you'll take comfort in a decision issued last week by Kings County Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in a case called Varveris v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
Department of the Treasury regulation interpreting the statute. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:15 pm
Treasury Department, in Washington, D.C. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
Too much water under the bridge at this point (even before we get to see what they do in King v. [read post]
