Search for: "King v. Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Website: http://cates1980.wixsite.com/cateswebsite Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/robert.piller.3979 Jeffrey Smith GE SOIL MICROBES NEW TARGET FOR AGRICHEMICAL COMPANIES. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
When Federal District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is presiding over the election interference case brought against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith, turned aside Trump’s immunity claim, she noted that the former president was asking her to convey on him “the divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:35 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lady Justice King, Lord Justice Arnold and Lord Justice Stuart-Smith) Yours Naturally Naturally Yours Ltd v Kate McVier Skin Ltd and another [2023] EWCA Civ 1493 (19 Dec 2023)This was an appeal by the defendants, Kate McIver Skin Limited ("KMS") and Christopher McIver (the personal representative and widower of Kate McIver ("Mrs McIver") the founder of KMS) [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Bessie Smith’s recording of “Down Hearted Blues” enters the U.S. public domain on January 1, 2024.Effect of the Music Modernization Act on Public Domain for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings The distinction between compositions and recordings is important to remember because these two types of copyrighted works won’t enter the public domain at the same time. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
The case of King v Victor Parsons & Co [1973] 1 WLR 29 examined the situation where a person acted recklessly “like the man who turns a blind eye” determining that a person who “refrained from further inquiry lest awareness of a risk should prove to be correct, was said to be in the same position as a person who acted knowingly”. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:20 am
In the non-precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Smith. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Smith. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
King v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The chief executive of Britain’s leading republican movement Graham Smith is seeking a judicial review of the lawfulness of his arrest during the King’s coronation, as well as damages and an admission of fault from Scotland Yard. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smith, 490 U.S. 794 (1989). [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 4:34 am
First, to determine whether a partnership formed, courts “must consider whether the parties expressly or implicitly intended to become partners” (Hammond v Smith, 151 AD3d 1896 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
Mark Smith put that argument to rest in Attention Originalists. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
White people are kings!!!! [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:57 am
Va. 664, 669-71, 542 S.E.2d 827, 832-34 (2000) 3 King v. [read post]
