Search for: "King v. Stuart"
Results 21 - 40
of 89
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
See Fox v. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm
The Brodies websit had a piece entitled “Stuart Campbell v Kezia Dugdale and the defence of fair comment for defamation in Scotland“. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 12:58 pm
" English supporters of restoring the Stuarts would pass a wine glass over a water jug while drinking a toast to the health of the king, as a clandestine symbol that one is actually toasting the "King over the Water," which is to say the Pretender, who lived in exile in France. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The word is rich with meaning, meaning that shifts subtly over the long arc of its engagement with the cultures that have used the word as the sign toward which meaning (and metaphor) could be attached.impeach (v.)formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder,… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
Attorney General Stuart M. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
Id.; King, 563 U.S. at 455. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Carnival Cruise Lines, Case No. 19-cv-21725-KING (S.D. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 11:56 am
From Logue v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Scotland In the case of Campbell v Dugdale [2019] ScotSC 32 the Sheriff’s Court dismissed a libel action against MSP Kezia Dugdale over an allegation that blogger Stuart Campbell had posted “homophobic tweets”. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
The 17th century Stuart kings, in particular, were criticized for using large fines to raise revenue, harass their political foes, and indefinitely detain those unable to pay. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
” In Canada, Southin J. in the British Columbia Supreme Court noted in 1986 that “the proclamation of the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms] by a process worthy of an alchemist, has transformed judges from lawyers into philosopher kings…”[21] In light of these views, one might expect that the explicit mention of philosophers would occur most frequently in the context of constitutional law. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
The 17th century Stuart kings, in particular, were criticized for using large fines to raise revenue, harass their political foes, and indefinitely detain those unable to pay.... [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm
Turns out it’s short for “qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur” – roughly, “who sues in this matter for the king as well as for himself. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Daniel O’Connor, Daniel V. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
" Hale v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:50 am
Grant, The Once and Future King: Sovereignty over Territory and the Annex VII Tribunal’s Award in Mauritius v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:24 am
Evid. 801(c) and 803; Safer, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 4:44 pm
Stuart (1976); In re King World Productions, Inc. (6th Cir. 1990). [read post]
