Search for: "King v. Superintendent"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2015, 12:44 am
V. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), PLIVA v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
The recent decision of Justice Fuerst in R v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Territorial Limitation of 216.5(a)(2) -- 216.5(a)(2)(i) This new subdivision applies only to claims "occurring" in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, and their adjacent waters. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 6:40 am
Territorial Limitation of 216.5(a)(2) -- 216.5(a)(2)(i) This new subdivision applies only to claims "occurring" in the counties of Bronx, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk or Westchester, and their adjacent waters. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:15 pm
Ct., Kings County 2009). [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
It will also be convenient to provide that notice of the interim order as well as of the final orders will be given to the Superintendent of Police forthwith. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm
Between 2001 and 2007, both the Park Service and the Forest Service required visitors to Yosemite National Park, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI), and the Inyo National Forest to use containers that had been tested and approved by the agencies. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm
Between 2001 and 2007, both the Park Service and the Forest Service required visitors to Yosemite National Park, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI), and the Inyo National Forest to use containers that had been tested and approved by the agencies. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:56 am
., which makes bear-resistant containers for use by backpackers (Ursack Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 10:18 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Dev Rai v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:17 am
" §3 of Article V of the Constitution provides that. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
Breytman v Schechter ;2011 NY Slip Op 50125(U) ;Decided on February 8, 2011 ;Supreme Court, Kings County ;Schack, J. is one of those cases which end with the Judge ordering that the plaintiff may not file any more papers except with the approval of the administrative judge. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
V .R. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:39 am
State v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
The power to detain under the 1971 Immigration Act had to be strictly construed, and should be compliant with the principles laid down in Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704, as extrapolated in Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre (1997) AC 97 PC (HK). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:12 am
Employee challenges denial of a retirement incentive provided in collective bargaining agreementSpano v Kings Park Cent. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:18 am
KINGS COUNTYLabor Law
Employers Are Denied Summary Judgment On Worker's Negligence, Labor Law Causes of Action
Clavijo v. [read post]
