Search for: "Kinney v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 12:38 pm by Chris Sutton
In a decision of significance for private schools and other tax-exempt organizations, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit(“Fourth Circuit”) decided recently that merely having 501(c)(3) tax status is not a form of “federal financial assistance” sufficient to subject a tax-exempt school or organization to compliance obligations under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (Title IX). [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 12:11 pm by Chris
” A recent case in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia evaluated whether community associations were exempt from filing requirements. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Va. 1954), observed that "we have found no authority in the United States which holds that mere defamation can be enjoined," and therefore reversed an anti-libel injunction. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:28 am
These comments specifically stated that the Devils River Unit should be excluded because the benefits of doing so outweighed the benefits of inclusion. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 12:50 pm by John Floyd
  The independent source doctrine was recently on display in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:00 am by Eric
* Missouri State Teachers Association v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  The plaintiff also advanced Arkansas state pharmacy regulations, but none of these created any duty of pharmacists to warn either patients or prescribing physicians. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 762 (Ky. 2004) (not a holding, but dictum suggesting broad comment k application).Louisiana: Kinney v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]