Search for: "Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 10:41 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the case in which the Supreme Court will likely decide whether the Alien Tort Statute confers federal jurisdiction over claims alleging corporate violations of customary international law. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:14 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., counsel for the petitioners responded to questions about extraterritoriality by citing the incident in Sierra Leone that led to the well-known 1795 opinion of Attorney General William Bradford. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:42 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum bring about in transnational human rights cases? [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:24 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 10:50 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the case in which the Supreme Court will likely decide whether the Alien Tort Statute confers federal jurisdiction over claims alleging corporate violations of customary international law. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., the decision in Kurns v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010), that corporations cannot be liable under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:41 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. that companies can not be subject to U.S. lawsuits by foreigners seeking damages for human rights violations under the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:21 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 2010 WL 3611392 (2d Cir. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:50 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., No. 10-1491, 2013 WL 1628935 (U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:45 am
Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm
Lawfare readers will recall that in March the Supreme Court ordered the case of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum to be re-briefed and reargued to address the additional question of whether the Alien Tort Statute applies to violations of international law occurring in the sovereign territory of other countries. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111, 120 (2d Cir. 2010) that corporations cannot be sued for alleged violations of customary international law under the Alien Tort Statute. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:08 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:09 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
by Melbourne Journal of International Law We are grateful to Justine Nolan for her thoughtful comments on the article, and in particular for highlighting two recent circuit court cases – Flomo v Firestone Natural Rubber Co in the Seventh Circuit and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation in the DC Circuit – which affirm that corporations can be liable under the Alien Tort Statute (‘ATS’), contrary to the position of the Second Circuit majority in… [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al. [read post]
