Search for: "Klinger v. Klinger"
Results 21 - 40
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
So, while Sherlock Holmes is a brilliant detective, even he may find it difficult to sort out the conflicting copyright laws of different nations. [1]Klinger v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am
In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
The following article was co-written with my colleague Gary Klinger for a Cozen O’Connor client Alert. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:45 am
Gruber v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
Klinger v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
Klinger v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:20 pm
In so holding Justice Aronin expressly rejected any argument that the loan agreement violated the Court of Appeals decision in Klinger v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 9:15 am
Felsher v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am
In Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate it was stated, by Judge Posner, that it was impossible to “find any basis in statute or case law for extending a copyright beyond its expiration. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:55 pm
Klinger v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
The action was filed with the United States District Court of New Mexico.In June 2014 the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that author Leslie Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that were no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:50 am
Indyne, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:41 pm
Klinger; Commentary: Remediating Forensic Science, by Michael J. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:52 pm
The Conan Doyle Estate’s Failed Quest Like many cases, Klinger v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:25 pm
In acknowledgment of our readers' Second Amendment rights, and until such time as District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
” In June this year the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that Mr Klinger was fr [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 6:02 am
In Google v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Ben Challis (1709 Blog) was quick off the mark with news that Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate (the "Sherlock Holmes" case) is not heading for a US Supreme Court ruling, Tara Aaron (Aaron Sanders) has potted this too, for IP Breakdown. [read post]
