Search for: "Knight v. Thomas" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
  This is a novel application of the common carrier doctrine to social media platforms, but a theory that Justice Thomas contemplated in a concurrence in Biden v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 5:55 am by Nicholas Rasmussen
” Following the May 13 demonstrations, a North Carolina-based chapter of the Ku Klux Klan — The Loyal White Knights — applied to demonstrate in Charlottesville. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm by binder'sblog
Justice Thomas felt the Court’s other social legislation decisions should be revisited: 1) Griswold v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Thomas's majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Nabil Shaikh
Knight First Amendment Institute. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 5:01 am by Mark MacCarthy
It accepts that the different policy goal, articulated in the Supreme Court’s Turner Broadcasting v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Ben Sperry
Both Sides Flip Flop on Common Carriage Ever since Justice Thomas used his concurrence in 2021’s Biden v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
In a statement from MP Julian Knight, the DCMS is said to be “keen to learn more about how Mr. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
The brief contains 7 shoutouts to Justice Thomas, but I wonder if his credibility has taken a hit. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 7:28 am by Eric Goldman
This is his third solo-authored anti-Section 230 statement; the prior rants came in the Knight First Amendment v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 3:11 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a statement regarding the court’s decision to deny review in Doe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:07 am by Eric Goldman
The Supreme Court dismisses the Knight First Amendment v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
At that time, four justices – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh – noted that they concurred in the decision to deny review because the factual record was too undeveloped to grant preliminary relief to the coach, emphasizing that they did not “necessarily agree with the decision (much less the opinion) below. [read post]