Search for: "Konzelman v. Konzelman" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Settlement agreements in matrimonial cases are contracts that should be enforced as long as they are fair and just
19 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by PaulKostro
” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The court accords particular leniency to agreements made in the domestic arena, and likewise allows judges greater discretion when interpreting such agreements
30 Jan 2012, 12:05 pm by PaulKostro
” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Spousal support agreements are always subject to modification upon a showing of changed circumstances
17 May 2011, 10:27 am by PaulKostro
Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
I THINK MY EX IS COHABITATING- NOW WHAT?
22 Feb 2011, 5:54 pm by Sandra C. Fava
Konzelman, 158 NJ 185 (1999) and Gayet v. [read post]
NJ Family Legal Blog - http://njfamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
The polestar of contract construction is to discover the intention of the parties as revealed by the language used by them
21 Jun 2010, 10:29 am by PaulKostro
” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
In contrast with alimony or support awards, a property agreement cannot be adjusted after divorce to reflect unanticipated changes in the parties’ circumstances
28 Apr 2010, 5:26 pm by PaulKostro
” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Cohabitation and Alimony in New Jersey
8 Aug 2013, 1:21 pm by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
The New Jersey Supreme Court in the case of Konzelman v. [read post]
New Jersey Divorce and Family Lawyer Blog - http://www.newjerseydivorcelawyer-blog.com/
Cohabitation creates a rebuttable presumption of changed circumstances shifting the burden to the dependent spouse to show that there is no actual economic benefit to the spouse or the cohabitant
28 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm by PaulKostro
Our courts have consistently viewed cohabitation as “tantamount to a marriage,” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Recent New Jersey Law Clarifies The Definition Of Cohabitation In Alimony Modification Cases
6 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Goldstein, Bachman & Newman, LLP
The legislature borrowed some wording from Konzelman v. [read post]
New Jersey Divorce Lawyers Blog - http://www.newjerseydivorcelawyers-blog.com/
In New Jersey, when does "shacking up" rise to the level of cohabiting?
10 Sep 2012, 6:42 am by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
" Konzelman v. [read post]
Linda's Law Blog - http://lindakernslaw.blogspot.com/
Cohabitation involves an intimate relationship in which the couple has undertaken duties and privileges that are commonly associated with marriage
24 Jun 2009, 8:53 am
Gayet, supra, 92 N.J. at 151; Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Cohabitation is sufficient grounds for the termination or modification of alimony, limited duration or otherwise, where the cohabitation provides the dependent spouse with a sufficiently material economic benefit
19 Apr 2011, 10:01 am by PaulKostro
See Konzelman, supra, 158 N.J. at 196; Gayet v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Settlements are generally upheld absent clear and convincing evidence of fraud or other compelling circumstances
8 Feb 2011, 9:20 am by PaulKostro
’” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
If a support arrangement provided for the circumstances that are now alleged as changed, it would not ordinarily be equitable and fair to grant modification
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by PaulKostro
” Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The party seeking modification has the burden of demonstrating a change in circumstances warranting relief from the support or maintenance obligations
21 Apr 2010, 9:25 am by PaulKostro
Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
The court may enforce an agreement if it is fair and equitable, but the court’s equitable authority to modify support obligations in response to changed circumstances cannot be restricted
21 Jan 2010, 8:06 am by PaulKostro
Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Where the parties have not provided otherwise by agreement, alimony may be modified based on changed circumstances resulting from cohabitation only if one cohabitant supports or subsidizes the other under circumstances sufficient to entitle the supporting
4 Feb 2010, 8:45 am by PaulKostro
Konzelman v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Post-Divorce Cohabitation and Alimony
17 Sep 2012, 11:34 am by John S. Eory
  In Gould v. [read post]
New Jersey Law Blog - http://www.njlawblog.com/
Bench-Slapped! Reinhardt v. Bybee
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/
Bench-Slapped! Reinhardt v. Bybee
3 Nov 2006, 4:01 am
Smith claimed that his guilty plea in the murder of Emmet Konzelman was no good since his supposed accomplice Jacob Edmonds -- who pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and testified against Smith -- later recanted his testimony.In his majority opinion, Reinhardt wrote that even though Smith had not exhausted his state claims, a rarely used exception should allow his case to move forward in federal court. [read post]
Above the Law - http://abovethelaw.com/