Search for: "Koons v. Koons" Results 21 - 40 of 242
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court of Canada simplifies the standard of review analysis in historic Super Bowl trilogy https://t.co/HNcpK4qXYK 2019-12-22 EU High Court Rules Against Digital Resale; We’ll Talk About This at the Conference https://t.co/SYM5ATw238 2019-12-22 Enersen not enforced in Wilson v Huuge, 9th Circ. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court of Canada simplifies the standard of review analysis in historic Super Bowl trilogy https://t.co/HNcpK4qXYK 2019-12-22 EU High Court Rules Against Digital Resale; We’ll Talk About This at the Conference https://t.co/SYM5ATw238 2019-12-22 Enersen not enforced in Wilson v Huuge, 9th Circ. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
” In a welcome development, the CA backed the approach of Laddie J (“a judge with prolific expertise in the law of copyright”) in Cala Homes v Alfred McAlpine [1995] FSR 818 at p.835 over the narrower one of Lightman J in Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622 at [27]-[28]. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:23 pm
In response, Goldsmith filed a counterclaim claiming that Warhol’s works constituted copyright infringement.Court findingsInfringement analysisThe court started its discussion by reiterating the criteria for copyright protection of a photographic work: the protectible, original elements must necessarily stem from the photographer’s original expression, such as “posing the subjects, lighting, angle, selection of film and camera, [and] evoking the desired expression” (citing… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:09 am
Koons, 960 F.2d 301, 307 (2d Cir. 1992) where it was held that elements of originality in photograph include “posing the subjects” and Gillespie v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:05 am by SHG
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
‘Portrait of An Artist (Pool with Two Figures)’ by David Hockney, sold for 90.3 million dollars, beating Jeff Koons’ ‘Balloon Dog’ (58.4 million dollars). [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Canadian copyright revision required under US/Mexico/Canada Agreement (USMCA) https://t.co/as1aj50v8V 2018-11-14 Bank of Israel awarded damages from convicted counterfeiters for… copyright infringement https://t.co/BT1R93sKNp 2018-11-14 Nintendo 'Wins' $12 Million From Pirate ROM Site Operators https://t.co/nl0h3xFYvK 2018-11-14 Taste not protected by copyright in EU Levola Hengelo, Judgment) [2018] EUECJ C-310/17 https://t.co/CQvrvTrhTK 2018-11-14 Court grants leave to amend… [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 11:28 am by Carolyn E. Wright
Other Cases Compare what Jeff Koons did with his use of Blanch’s photo in Blanch v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Adam Feldman
This includes a cite in Koons to the decision in Hughes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:47 pm by Douglas Berman
The parties’ briefs and oral arguments made the statutory issue in Koons v. [read post]