Search for: "Koontz v. Koontz"
Results 21 - 40
of 167
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2018, 8:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
In Koontz v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
(As a side note, it is interesting to compare this ruling to yesterday’s decision of the U.S. district court for the district of Kansas in Koontz v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:15 pm
The Supreme Court made this clear with its landmark decision in NAACP v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:41 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Koontz v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
City of West Hollywood 16-1137 Issue: Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am
City of West Hollywood, 16-1137 Issue: Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
Charles Koontz, Counterclaim Respondent-AND-Don Coldsmith, Cross-Claimant v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am
City of West Hollywood, 16-1137 Issue: Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
City of West Hollywood 16-1137 Issue: Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 2:56 pm
The complaint (full text) in Koontz v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
City of West Hollywood 16-1137 Issue: Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
City of West Hollywood, 16-1137 Issue: Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 6:42 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:45 am
Supreme Court in Nollan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:29 pm
New York University law Professor Roderick Hills has posted a thoughtful response to my post criticizing the Supreme Court’s just-issued decision in em>Murr v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:59 pm
You can read about the Takings law review article that Luke Wake and Jarod Bona published about Koontz v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:23 pm
City of West Hollywood 16-1137 Issue(s): Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am
Grace v. [read post]
