Search for: "Koppel v. Koppel" Results 21 - 40 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
Finally, in the Wall Street Journal, Nathan Koppel reports on the impact of last Term’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:04 am by Ashby Jones
Click here for Tuesday’s WSJ story on the ruling; here for Judge Sweet’s opinion; here for the Nathan Koppel’s overview of the issues, pubbed last December in the WSJ. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 5:58 am
Lawyers who earn fees only when they benefit their clients v. bankers who pocket millions despite hurting them. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:16 am by James Bickford
Briefly: Alex Pham summarizes the video game industry’s recently filed brief in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:18 am
Supreme Court will not hear the issue of whether New York Lawyers can use nicknames, client testimonials, other messages or images in advertising.In Cahill v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:34 pm by Erin Miller
Nathan Koppel at the WSJ Law Blog summarizes last week’s ABA Journal article on the “flexible standards” established by the Court for patent cases in Bilski v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am by Joshua Matz
” And writing at Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf suggests that Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Hudson’s decision in Commonwealth of Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:09 am by Ted Frank
More coverage: Koppel @ WSJ; Frankel @ Reuters; Crede; earlier. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:39 am by Conor McEvily
  Steven Bennett of Jones Day analyzes the Court’s 2010 decision in Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am by Adam Chandler
Last Thursday's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:14 pm
Rodgin Cohen, was "pretty angry" when he learned that the New York Times would be covering Charney v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States and Black v. [read post]