Search for: "Kovacs v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Although the Trump Administration recently announced its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, United States lawmakers took note of the report. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
Massachusetts’s highest court based its decision on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 7:09 am by John Elwood
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Under the policy, non-Mexican asylum applicants who enter the United States at the nation’s southern border must wait in Mexico while their applications are processed. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm by Jeffrey Lubbers
These proposals would mainly codify some of the courts’ common law decisions or the kinds of consensus-based recommendations made by the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:04 am by Jay Wexler
  At this point, with the advice of an ex-editor friend of mine, I decided to reframe the issue once more, into a short book about the history of the bald eagle as a symbol in the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 9:30 pm
Microsoft, in which my former boss, David Boies, is often credited with winning the case for the United States government. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
In the United States, a handful of instances were identified involving Internet service providers (ISPs) slowing transmission speeds (“throttling”) or limiting access to competitors’ services, but those cases were resolved through existing means by the FCC or the courts. [read post]