Search for: "Kraft v. Lowe"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 4:26 am
Farmgirl Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:51 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Supreme Court: McCutcheon v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Kraft Foods Group Brands, LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:25 am
See A & H Sportswear, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 5:21 am
Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:22 am
Red v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Some of those job losses came when candy companies like Fannie May and Brach’s moved the bulk of their manufacturing to Mexico and Kraft relocated a 600-worker Life Savers factory from Michigan to Canada, in order to pay global market prices for sugar. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:35 pm
., Kraft v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:14 am
[iv] [v] One of these chemicals, 4-phenylcyclohexene (4-PC), is mainly responsible for the odour of new carpets. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
Selectica, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
Still a gap in surveys of GC v law firms. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
