Search for: "Kramer v. Kramer" Results 21 - 40 of 664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Will Baude
Larry Kramer, a widely respected legal scholar and historian who was my constitutional law professor at N.Y.U. 20 years ago, called it quits in 2008, on the heels of the Supreme Court's divisive decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 8:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Following a preface in which Prof Xandra Kramer paints a vivid picture of Jonathan’s humanity, humour and wit, and an introduction by ourselves as the editors, Part I includes four chapters which address conceptual matters relating to the nature and scope of private international law. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant was not discharged for cause, nor did it charge legal fees for any work associated with the motion practice ensuing from the supplemental disclosures (see Decolator, Cohen & DiPrisco v Lysaght, Lysaght & Kramer, 304 AD2d 86, 91 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
By Alec Lesseliers Introduction The British Museum, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (MET), and the Germanisches Nationalmuseum are a few of the world’s most famous and largest history museums with objects in their collection from all over the world. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Several of Kramer’s team members, including Derron Slonecker, Joshua Scherer, and Adam Verost, followed Kramer to PWP. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “ Here, the plaintiffs failed to plead that, but for the defendants’ negligence, they would have prevailed in the underlying action (see Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506; Keness v Feldman, Kramer & Monaco, P.C., 105 AD3d at 813). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Vitulli “breached a duty owed to the shareholder independent of any duty owing to the corporation wronged” (Abrams v Donati, 66 NY2d 951, 953; see Kramer v Meridian Capital Group, LLC, 201 AD3d 909, 911; Jacobs v Cartalemi, 156 AD3d 605, 608; Patterson v Calogero, 150 AD3d 1131, 1133). [read post]