Search for: "Kraus v Kraus" Results 21 - 40 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 10:54 am by randal shaheen
On January 27, the Supreme Court of California issued its long-awaited opinion in Kwikset Corporation v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, “the defense of usury does not apply where . . . the terms of the . . . note impose a rate of interest in excess of the statutory maximum only after default or maturity” (Torto Note Member, LLC v Babad, 192 AD3d 843, 845 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Kraus v Mendelsohn, 97 AD3d 641, 641). [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:31 am
Yes, answers the Court of Justice in its Grand Chamber formation in its judgments in Case C-531/06 Commission v. [read post]