Search for: "Kuehne v. State"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 1:07 am
Holder, and another, Ricci v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:52 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 626 (1989) that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not protect the right of a criminal defendant to use criminally derived proceeds for legal fees. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:19 am
See London Drugs Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:50 am
In 2007, Murphy first sued in federal court; the case was sent to state court. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
V. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Kuehne, P.A. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
"Bongiovanni stated he spoke with Nella on several occasions after her husband died and suggested to her that she execute a new will. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:32 pm
” In Kuehn v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:23 am
Bowles v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
15 May 2010, 8:53 pm
There is nothing in the Rule that limits the extension of the term “sufficient reason” to matters relating to the quantum of the claim. [12] Factors that can give rise to “sufficient reason” were set out in Kuehne v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:48 pm
Some of those other reasons were identified in Kuehne v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Among his most notable cases are Halbert v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
On the same day Sir David Eady refused a number of applications in the case of Otuo v Morley. [read post]
