Search for: "Kunkel v Kunkel"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 11:12 am
U-HP–John Shulock, 1B–Vic Voltaggio, 2B–Bill Kunkel, 3B–Terry Cooney. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Kunkel declined to approve Smith’s request to withdraw his resignation, citing 4 NYCRR5.3(c) of the rules. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Kunkel declined to approve Smith’s request to withdraw his resignation, citing 4 NYCRR5.3(c) of the rules. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:30 am
" See Claar v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:59 am
See Roberts v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 12:07 am
Kunkel, ___ F. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 12:29 pm
”Kunkel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
See, EEOC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:29 am
In October, in Watermeir v. [read post]