Search for: "LEE v. STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm
New Appropriations as a Less-Restrictive AlternativeJustice Alito also floated the notion (pp. 41-43) that applying a legal requirement to religious objectors cannot be the "least restrictive" means of advancing a compelling government interest if Congress can simply appropriate new funds to compensate for the cost of RFRA exemptions. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
And indeed the logic of United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am
An application of Ruttiger TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Bus.L.J. 219-272 (2011).INSURANCE LAW.Yin, Haitao, Howard Kunreuther and Matthew W. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 3:40 am
” 16 Lee R. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Petition for certiorari Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of Landmark Legal Foundation Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Family Research Council Harvey v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
In Royal v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/c4h Kolev v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The travelers truthfully explained that the funds were legal gambling proceeds, not evidence of drug transactions. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Lee County Sch. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
Applying Ortiz v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Therefore, as a matter of apparent first impression, the District Court of Appeal held that the defendant was not a "wrongfully incarcerated person" entitled to compensation under the Victims of Wrongful Incarceration Compensation Act. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Three new petitions granted Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
This was after Eugene V. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Paul Lees-Haley. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
Paul Lees-Haley. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
” Later Time said that Picard has sued various large feeder funds for ten billion dollars. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
UIM coverage provides funds to an insured if the liability insurance held by the person responsible for the accident is insufficient to compensate the insured for injuries incurred. [read post]
