Search for: "LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. USA"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Accordingly, the president’s subordinates were enjoined from implementing or giving effect to: Executive Order 13,836 Sections 5(a) 5(e), and 6; Executive Order 13,837 Sections 3(a), 4(a), and 4(b); and Executive Order 13,839 Sections 3, 4(a), and 4(c) (American Federation of Government Employees v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 2:05 pm
On December 31, 2019, the Ninth Circuit released an amended opinion in Enigma Software Group USA, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
”[3] Knight Institute, slip op. at 24-25. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Scripps Networks Interactive, LLC, 2011 WL 1750711 (W.D. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am
Mar. 24, 2022) (“code”, “application” and “system”); and VDPP LLC, v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 12:31 pm
Capital One Bank (USA), NA., No. 08-16-00234-CV (Tex.App.- El Paso, 2018, pet. filed) (affirming summary judgment for credit card bank on two theories)..McFarland v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:35 am
" The applicants filed a pre-appeal request, relying solely on DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 6:00 pm
(Ars Technica) Battle between software patents and open source (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions District Court E D Texas: Jury finds in favour of Limelight on ongoing battle with Level 3 Communication over patents covering internet content delivery network technology (Law360) USPTO overturns patent for virtual subdomains filed by Ideaflood (Ars Technica) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Bilski petitions the… [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
In the USA, the Copyright Office issued a Notice of inquiry and request for comments[36] on August 30, 2023, seeking comments on copyright law and policy issues raised by AI, “including those involved in the use of copyrighted works to train AI models, the appropriate levels of transparency and disclosure with respect to the use of copyrighted works (…). [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) 3. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Jape; Stevo Design v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
The ‘174 patent is currently the subject of a litigation styled Chris Cacace & Culinary Edge Creation, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
Among other things, the companies own and operate coal-fired power plants in six states in the USA. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:50 am
Summit Agro USA, LLC, 2014 WL 6627727, No. 14–51 (D. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
These efforts have produced both law at the domestic level and norms and structuring principles at the international level. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Heritage Music Foundation (TTABlog) Precedential no. 4: TTAB finds that “NKJV” has acquired distinctiveness for bibles: In re Thomas Nelson, Inc (TTABlog) Precedential no. 3: Finding KUBA KUBA primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive for cigars, TTAB affirms 2(e)(3) refusal: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (TTABlog) Precedential no. 2: TTAB cancels supplemental registration for shape of culvert unit due to functionality: Kistner Concrete Products,… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
In McCallum v Archstone Communities LLC, for example, evidence that an employee was rated as “meets expectations” despite ongoing policy violations but was then fired for the violations after she announced her pregnancy, combined with her manager’s negative reaction to the pregnancy and the employer’s failure to follow its own policy in investigating the misconduct, precluded summary judgment on the employee’s pregnancy bias claim. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Lonestar Communications Corporation LLC v Kaye & Ors [2023] EWHC 421 (Comm). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
