Search for: "LITTLE v. INCH"
Results 21 - 40
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2016, 11:43 am
Recently, in the case of Carlson v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 8:15 am
–Imapizza v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
LEXIS 80557 (MD PA, May 14, 2018), a Pennsylvania federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations and dismissed an inmate's complaint that his request for a visit from a prison chaplain was rejected.In Little v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:11 am
However, it’s the little details that really make me shake my head: a 360 inch TV, a non-functional helipad with a sculptural homage to Airwolf, two elevators lined with alligator skin (WTF?) [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
Each detainee is chained to the cable using an eighteen-inch ankle shackle. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 6:17 pm
That makes the decision technically precise but, frankly, a little tough to read. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
Here's what the Court of Appeal says about it:"In Property Reserve v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
I had just joined Gibson, Ochsner and Little and Mr. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
The police need three indicators of impairment to request field sobriety exercises based upon the Origi v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:00 pm
In Embody v. [read post]
29 Sep 2012, 7:00 pm
In Embody v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 10:15 am
Seaton v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Friday, socking the nation’s capital with anywhere from 17.8 inches (the official measurement at Washington-Reagan National Airport) to 30 inches (or more in outlying areas), one could accurately predict that schools, businesses, and even the federal government would remain closed on Monday. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Much conjecture, little fireworks, super possible large-time implications. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:51 am
The crack in the blinds was a little longer than half the length of the blinds, and the height of the crack was approximately an inch or less. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:01 am
For example, the group cites the Massachusetts law (93A), but the recent case Rule v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 7:45 pm
" The article specifically discusses Justice Scalia's dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
Fan Fi International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The project at issue was the installation of telecommunications equipment by T-Mobile on certain existing utility poles in the City of San Francisco, to wit: “three 26.1-inch high, 6.1-inch wide, 2.7-inch deep antennas concealed within an enclosure that is affixed at the top of the utility pole and painted to match it, plus four 24-inch high, 17-inch wide, 11-inch deep cabinets and an [sic] 10.88-inch high, 8-inch wide,… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The project at issue was the installation of telecommunications equipment by T-Mobile on certain existing utility poles in the City of San Francisco, to wit: “three 26.1-inch high, 6.1-inch wide, 2.7-inch deep antennas concealed within an enclosure that is affixed at the top of the utility pole and painted to match it, plus four 24-inch high, 17-inch wide, 11-inch deep cabinets and an [sic] 10.88-inch high, 8-inch wide,… [read post]
