Search for: "LTD" Results 21 - 40 of 32,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2015, 12:01 pm
In  John Kaldor Fabricmaker UK Ltd v Lee Ann Fashions Ltd [2014] EWHC 3779 (IPEC) (21 Nov 2014) which I discussed in Is this a copy? [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 6:20 am
Ltd. v Sky UK Ltd and others  [2019] EWHC 2376 (Ch) This was a claim by the famous consumer electronics and video games company, Nintendo Company Limited, for an order requiring Sky UK Ltd [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 4:33 am
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (HH Judge Hacon) Bentley 1962 Ltd and another v Bentley Motors Ltd [2019] EWHC 2925 (Ch) (1 Nov 2019) This was a claim for trade mark infringement against the well-known luxury car manufacturer, Bentley Motors Ltd. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:50 am
    That is what appears to have happened in Vimage Products Ltd v [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 1:02 pm
"In this case", began Lord Sumption in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 (3 July 2013).   [read post]
17 May 2010, 2:19 am by sally
Mobilx Ltd ( in administration) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; Blue Sphere Global Ltd v Same; Calltel Telecom Ltd and another v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 517; [2010] WLR (D) 124 “Where a trader had means of knowing that by his purchase he was participating in a transaction connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT he lost his right to deduct input tax but only when he knew or should have known that the transaction was connected to fraud. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd Court of Appeal “Where a charterparty provided that the vessel should load at a single named safe port, the charterers thereby warranted the safety of that port. [read post]
26 May 2009, 4:05 am
Aerotel Ltd v Wavecrest Group Enterprises Ltd and others [2009] EWCA Civ 408; [2009] WLR (D) 171 “A patentee seeking to rely on commercial success as an indicator of non-obviousness in order to rebut an allegation of its patent being obvious over prior art had to establish that the commercial success relied on was due to [...] [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
JHP Ltd v BBC Worldwide Ltd and another [2008] EWHC 757 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 120 “In order to succeed in a claim for copying an original work, the claimant had to establish on the balance of probabilities that the defendant had copied a substantial part of that work. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd and Another Court of Appeal “An offer of an undertaking by one party lapsed automatically when the court found in favour of the other side and the offer was not resurrected after a successful appeal. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:49 am by michael
Hoist UK Ltd v Reid Lifting Ltd; [2010] EWHC 1922 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 215 “CPR r 38.5(3) should be construed as meaning that discontinuance did not affect any proceedings to deal with any question of costs, whether or not such proceedings had already been commenced at the date of discontinuance. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:04 am by sally
Cherry Tree Investments Ltd v Landmain Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 736; [2012] WLR (D) 170 “Where it was alleged that a registered charge included an extended power of sale which was included in a facility agreement but was not referred to in the charge, the correct approach was to bring a properly pleaded and proved claim for rectification of the charge, not to seek to apply a ‘corrective construction’ of the charge by reference to extrinsic material. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:43 am by sally
DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail) Ltd [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 109 “The current practice, in which applications to transfer cases to and from the Patents County Court were handled by judges of the court from which the case was to be transferred, was correct and in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules.” WLR Daily, 3rd April 2012 Soure: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 2:24 am
Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd and another [2009] EWCA Civ 44; [2009] WLR (D) 48 “An offer of an undertaking by one party lapsed automatically once the court found in favour of the other side and the offer was not resurrected when the losing side successfully appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:54 am by sally
Cherry Tree Investments Ltd v Landmain Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 736; [2012] WLR (D) 170 “Where it was alleged that a registered charge included an extended power of sale which was included in a facility agreement but was not referred to in the charge, the correct approach was to bring a properly pleaded and proved claim for rectification of the charge, not to seek to apply a ‘corrective construction’ of the charge by reference to extrinsic material.” WLR Daily,… [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:20 am by sally
Freetown Ltd v Assethold Ltd [2012] EWHC 1351 (QB); [2012] WLR (D) 162 “Service of a surveyor’s award sent by post, pursuant to section 15(1) of the Party Wall etc Act 1996, was effected when the award was consigned to the post.” WLR Daily, 21st May 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:39 am
Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd and another v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and another Butters and others (joint administrators of WW Realisation 8 Ltd and another) v BBC Worldwide Ltd and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1160; [2009] WLR (D) 322 "The anti-deprivation rule, which as a matter of public policy prevented parties from contracting out of the [...] [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:51 am by sally
Generics (UK) Ltd v Yeda Research & Development Co Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 726; [2012] WLR (D) 169 “The principles established in Prince Jefri Bolkiah v KPMG (A firm) [1999] 2 AC 222 were not applicable to a case in which the former employer of a patent attorney now employed within a competitor organisation sought injunctive relief to restrain the current employer from acting by, or otherwise seeking assistance or advice from, the patent attorney in relation to… [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by sally
The Bridgewater Canal Company Ltd v GEO Networks Ltd [2010] EWHC 548 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 85 “The consideration payable, pursuant to para 13(2)(e)(ii) of Sch 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1984, as amended by the Communications Act 2003, by an operator of a communications network to a person with control of land for the right to carry out work undertaken pursuant to the provisions of the Electronic Communications Code, as contained in Sch 2 to the 1984, as amended, included… [read post]