Search for: "LaRocca v. LaRocca" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”], citing Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, 73 NY2d 417, 424 [1989]). [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:17 am
The New York Court of Appeals takes a rather cautious approach to determining whether a relationship necessary to support a claim for negligent misrepresentation exists (see Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, 73 NY2d 417, 424 [1989] ["[w]e have defined this duty narrowly, more narrowly than other jurisdictions"]). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Under this analysis, a professional may be held liable for negligence or malpractice even when they are not retained by plaintiff if a relationship exists between the parties that is so close as to approach privity (see Ossining Union Free School Dist. v Anderson LaRocca Anderson, 73 NY2d 417, 425 [I989]). [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm
* Use immunity   The question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
*The question of compelling a public officer or employee to testify or risk termination was considered by the Court of Appeals in Matt v LaRocca, 71 NY2d 154, cert denied 486 US 1007. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:55 am
Republic Services, Inc., et al., CV04-1352-DAE (LRL) consolidated with Robert LaRocca and William Lacy v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
However, the decision noted that New York courts have found that the disposition of misconduct charges does not constitute part of an employee’s “employment history” as that phrase is used in FOIL, citing LaRocca v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:29 am
” [Seabrook v Johnston, 660 NY2d 311, United States v Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115]. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:30 am by Máiréad Enright
For instance, a jury can be given instructions which overcome the influence of a party’s religious dress or a court can require that a veil be removed for security checks but worn in the court itself (but see LaRocca v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]