Search for: "Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 4:47 am
In Stern Produce Co., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 6:34 pm
The Glacier Northwest case centers on a labor dispute between striking truck drivers and their employer, a company that provides pre-mixed concrete for construction projects. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 12:16 pm
Sanitary Truck Drivers, 362 NLRB No. 186. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 12:36 pm
The first charge alleged that a company supervisor violated the National Labor Relations Act (the “Act”) when he texted a truck driver letting him know he could not cover up the cameras installed in the truck. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:00 pm
However, recent court and labor board decisions indicate that the traditional definition of “employee” continues to expand. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm
That court held it could not hear a state tort claim until the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) weighed in on whether the drivers’ actions were protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm
That court held it could not hear a state tort claim until the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) weighed in on whether the drivers’ actions were protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:06 am
The Board erred when, focusing on the fact that several dozen drivers were ultimately moved to a bargaining unit where they were paid significantly less, it ruled that the company had impermissibly changed the scope of the bargaining unit (Aggregate Industries v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 6:18 am
The court denied the employer’s petition for review and granted the Board’s cross-application for enforcement of its decision finding that the company’s refusal to reinstate the striking workers was an unfair labor practice (Spurlino Materials, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
” Moreover, the Board properly applied the doctrine in finding an employer unlawfully refused to bargain with the union that represented a group of truck drivers once it took over their bankrupt employer’s operations. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
An administrative agency, the National Mediation Board (NMB), is empowered to implement the legislation, including resolution of union representation requests and disputes over interference with employee and union rights. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
That court held it couldn’t hear a state tort (wrongful act) claim until the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) weighed in on whether the drivers’ actions were protected under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:17 am
Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.). [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 11:06 am
A third legal development is a regulatory initiative by the National Labor Relations Board and the Federal Trade Commission to coordinate agency action against companies, particularly those in the gig economy, regarded as undermining competition and the right to unionize through the misclassification of employees as independent contractors. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
Accts. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/Board%20Decisions/350/v35074.htm The Board adopted the administrative law judge's findings that Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by taking the following unilateral actions without giving the Union notice and an opportunity to bargain: (i) assigning a new store account to a bargaining unit driver's delivery route; (ii) reassigning a store vacated by a… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
FMCSA considering loosening hours-of-service restrictions for commercial truck drivers. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:06 am
” Labor law cases Kavanaugh has written a number of opinions reviewing National Labor Relations Board decisions; in many of these cases, he voted to reverse the board. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Instead, he concluded that the Respondent's unilateral action was unlawful because the Respondent hired a workforce consisting solely of its predecessor's Union-represented employees and that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
UberBLACK limo drivers aren’t. [read post]