Search for: "Lackey v. Lackey" Results 21 - 40 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
   Such is ICLB's Oxford correspondent, with the latest dispatch from the courtroom -- a default judgment was entered against the defendants as a sanction for improper conduct in the Jones v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Like the testimony by Judge Lackey yesterday about not being able to go to the Mississippi Attorney General's Office because, he was told, Jim Hood had buckled to pressure from Dickie Scruggs to cooperate in Scruggs' mass Katrina settlement with State Farm that netted the $26.5 million in fees at the core of the Jones v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
March 17 remains the last day for plea bargains in USA v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 11:30 am
Rossmiller also analyzes the underlying Jones v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 5:14 am
Let's take another look at yesterday's defense motion in USA v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 8:51 am
  On that date, the indictment said Balducci discussed the amended order obtained from Judge Lackey in the Jones v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
  I figured there would be a more complete story later, and I was right.This story, by Steve Korris of Legal Newsline, talks about a ruling by Judge Coleman, the new judge in the fee dispute case that led to the alleged plot to bribe Judge Lackey, Jones, Funderburg v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:14 am
Nationwide appeal, and who had a sharp exchange with William Walker, counsel for the policyholders, during oral argument last year in the Broussard v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
  Dickie Scruggs, Zach Scruggs, Backstrom, Balducci and Patterson allegedly met at the Scruggs Law Firm in Oxford to discuss how to influence the outcome of the Jones v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 12:17 pm by Mack Sperling
  But the unpublished Order last week in Ray Lackey Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
"Which raises the question: if an order for arbitration was a foregone conclusion, why are Scruggs chums floating the theory that attorney Timothy Balducci thought he could impress Scruggs by getting such an order from Judge Lackey? [read post]